
Image Source: unsplash
In the blockchain world, you often hear the advice: never trust any code. Even smart contracts that have undergone professional audits have led to numerous projects being exploited due to vulnerabilities or design flaws. The table below shows the common attack types and their proportions:
| Attack Type | Percentage |
|---|---|
| Reentrancy attacks | 26% |
| Flash loan attacks | 11% |
| Unaudited projects | 90% |
With the widespread adoption of automation and smart contracts, asset security risks continue to rise. You may encounter the following threats:
To control risks, you can choose tools such as cold wallets and hardware authentication to proactively improve the security level of your digital assets.

Image Source: unsplash
In the blockchain space, you frequently hear “never trust any code” because many major historical security incidents originated from code vulnerabilities. Even when development teams invest significant effort in testing and auditing, risks cannot be completely eliminated. The table below presents several well-known blockchain projects that suffered massive losses due to code vulnerabilities:
| Incident | Loss Amount | Vulnerability Type |
|---|---|---|
| Wormhole bridge attack | $324,000,000 | Lack of input validation |
| The DAO attack | $150,000,000 | Recursive call vulnerability |
| Parity multi-sig wallet | $30,000,000 | Access control vulnerability |
| Mango Markets attack | $112,000,000 | Price oracle manipulation |
| MonoX logic error | $31,000,000 | Logic error |
You can see that a single vulnerability can cause losses ranging from tens of millions to hundreds of millions of dollars. The chart below visually illustrates the economic impact of these incidents:

These events remind you that code itself should not be fully trusted. Even projects that undergo multiple rounds of auditing may still contain hidden backdoors or logic flaws. “Never trust any code” has become a fundamental principle in the field of digital asset security.
The automation feature of smart contracts allows complex operations to be completed without human intervention, but it also introduces new attack surfaces. Automation enables attackers to search for and exploit vulnerabilities in bulk and at high speed. You need to be vigilant about the following common risks:
Automation makes attacks more efficient and covert. You cannot rely on traditional manual review to detect all risks in time. “Never trust any code” becomes especially important in the automated environment of smart contracts.
You may believe that code auditing can eliminate most risks, but the reality is far more complex. Auditing tools and processes have clear limitations:
| Evidence Type | Specific Content |
|---|---|
| Limitations of automated tools | Current security tools can only detect 8–20% of exploitable vulnerabilities; automated vulnerability discovery is severely insufficient. |
| Importance of human factors | Human involvement is critical for discovering uncommon vulnerabilities, logic errors, and economic factors—automated tools cannot replace it. |
| Comprehensive security strategy | Automated tools are good at finding common coding errors, but full security requires combining manual review and contextual analysis. |
You need to understand that auditing is not omnipotent. Automated tools cover only a limited scope, and manual review may miss critical issues due to lack of experience or time pressure. “Never trust any code” is not only a warning to developers but also a principle you must keep in mind when managing assets.
Throughout digital asset management, you should always remain vigilant. Code vulnerabilities, automation risks, and auditing limitations together create complex security challenges. Only by adhering to “never trust any code” can you minimize the possibility of asset losses.
You will notice that as the automation level of digital asset platforms increases, the attack surface is also continuously expanding. Attackers use automated tools for asset discovery, vulnerability scanning, and rapid response, greatly improving attack efficiency. Today, Attack Surface Management (ASM) tools not only monitor on-premises assets but also provide full coverage of cloud resources. Machine learning and artificial intelligence technologies drive ASM development, bringing predictive analytics and anomaly detection capabilities. Automated incident response mechanisms make cyber threat handling faster. Manual processes can no longer cope with the scale of modern infrastructure—automation has become the mainstream trend. You need to pay attention to the following new changes:
When using digital asset platforms, you often rely on third-party libraries, plugins, and services. Supply chain attacks have become an emerging threat—attackers tamper with dependency components or inject malicious code, indirectly compromising your asset security. You cannot fully control all dependencies, and risks increase accordingly. The table below shows common supply chain risks:
| Risk Type | Impact Method |
|---|---|
| Third-party library vulnerabilities | Asset leakage, theft |
| Malicious code in plugins | Backdoors, data tampering |
| Hijacked API interfaces | Transactions intercepted or altered |
You need to regularly review dependencies and monitor official security announcements to reduce unnecessary third-party integrations.
Attackers not only rely on technical means but also use social engineering and phishing strategies to trick you into disclosing sensitive information. You may encounter the following common tactics:
You need to stay vigilant, verify the source of websites and applications, and avoid entering sensitive information on untrusted channels. Social engineering attacks often exploit your trust and carelessness—awareness is the most effective protective measure.

Image Source: unsplash
When managing digital assets, cold wallets store private keys offline, effectively isolating them from network risks. Cold wallets do not connect to the internet, resulting in a minimal attack surface and making it extremely difficult for hackers to remotely access your assets. The table below compares cold wallets and hot wallets in terms of risk level and security characteristics:
| Wallet Type | Connection Status | Risk Level |
|---|---|---|
| Cold wallet | Offline | Low |
| Hot wallet | Online | High |
| Wallet Type | Security Feature | Attack Surface |
|---|---|---|
| Cold wallet | No internet connection | Minimal |
| Hot wallet | Connected to the internet | Large |
Cold wallets use offline signing mechanisms, ensuring private keys are never exposed to any networked device. You can transmit signed data securely via encrypted QR codes. Some cold wallets also use CC EAL6+ chips to protect private keys against physical attacks and reverse engineering. Throughout asset management, you must always remember “never trust any code”—the physical isolation of cold wallets provides the most direct protection.
If you plan to hold large amounts of cryptocurrency long-term, cold wallets are the best choice. Cold wallets are completely offline, isolating private keys from the internet—ideal for long-term storage and protection against platform failures or hacker attacks. The table below summarizes recommended use cases for cold wallets:
| Evidence Type | Description |
|---|---|
| Long-term storage | Cold wallets provide enhanced security suitable for long-term holding of large amounts of cryptocurrency. |
| Protective measure | Cold wallets store cryptocurrency offline to prevent network attacks. |
In scenarios such as global payments, cryptocurrency trading, and asset exchange, you can choose services like BiyaPay that support cold wallet management to ensure fund security. Cold wallets have become the gold standard for long-term digital asset storage, especially suitable for Chinese-speaking users during cross-border remittances and asset allocation.
When using cold wallets, you need to pay attention to the following security details:
By following these precautions, you can effectively prevent common supply chain and initialization security risks.
When managing digital assets, hardware wallets provide physical isolation for private keys. The device stores private keys completely offline, avoiding attacks from computer viruses and hackers. You have physical control over the device, and all transactions require authorization through the device. Hardware wallets have built-in screens that allow you to confirm transaction details before signing. Even if your computer or phone is infected with malware, the device can still protect your asset security. You can securely access and manage assets from any computer without worrying about private key exposure. Hardware wallets typically use secure microcontrollers to generate and protect private keys. Unsigned data is sent from the computer to the device; after you confirm on the screen, the device internally completes the signing, and the private key is never exposed in a networked environment.
When choosing a hardware wallet, you can consider products that support hardware authentication, such as BiyaPay, to enhance asset security.
In digital asset management, adopting multi-factor authentication can further improve security levels. Multi-factor authentication requires you to provide multiple forms of verification, such as password plus hardware device confirmation. Even if attackers obtain your password, they cannot easily access assets without the physical device. The table below shows the advantages of multi-factor authentication:
| Evidence Type | Description |
|---|---|
| Multi-factor authentication | Enhances security by requiring users to provide multiple verification forms |
| Attacker difficulty | Even if attackers obtain the password, unauthorized access remains difficult |
In daily operations, it is recommended to enable multiple protection measures such as PIN codes, physical confirmation, and recovery phrases simultaneously to minimize risks. Never trust any code—only multi-factor authentication combined with physical isolation can truly safeguard your assets.
When configuring and managing hardware authentication devices, follow best practices to ensure the device is secure and reliable.
Throughout asset management, always stay vigilant and regularly check device status and backup security. Only by strictly following security processes can you effectively defend against cyber attacks and malware in the age of automation and protect your digital assets.
When selecting a hot wallet, prioritize officially verified or mainstream open-source projects. Reputable wallets undergo multiple rounds of review by the community and security teams and can promptly fix known vulnerabilities. You should obtain the latest version from the wallet’s official website or authoritative open-source platforms and avoid downloading tampered or malware-injected applications. You also need to pay attention to the wallet’s update frequency and community activity—these factors directly affect wallet security and maintainability. Before installing a wallet, carefully verify developer information and digital signatures to ensure the source is trustworthy.
If you need both long-term storage and a smaller balance for routine transfers or reallocation, a safer approach is to separate assets by purpose. Keep long-term holdings in cold storage, and leave only operational funds in an active account under official channels, rather than exposing your entire balance to a high-frequency online environment.
Using the BiyaPay website as an example, payments, trading, and fund management can be handled within one multi-asset wallet system. When action is actually needed, it is still better to enter through the official trading entry instead of jumping through unknown plugins, scripts, or mirror pages; in practice, that is also an extension of the idea that you should never trust any code too easily.
On devices used for hot wallets, you must enable lock screen passwords, fingerprint, or facial recognition security measures. This prevents unauthorized access to your wallet when you leave the device unattended. You should also enable full-disk encryption to protect data if the device is lost or stolen. Regularly update the operating system and wallet application and install security patches promptly to defend against emerging malware and attack methods. You can dedicate a phone or computer specifically for cryptocurrency operations to reduce mixing with daily entertainment and social applications, further lowering risk.
Developing good security habits when managing hot wallets daily is crucial. The following recommendations can help you minimize asset risk to the greatest extent:
By consistently following these security habits, you can significantly reduce the probability of hot wallet attacks or asset losses. Asset security requires proactive protection—any negligence may lead to irreversible losses.
When selecting and setting up a cold wallet, strictly follow the process to ensure asset security. The following steps can help you minimize risks:
By following this process, you can effectively prevent common supply chain and initialization security risks.
When managing hardware authentication devices, establish a multi-layered protection system. It is recommended to adopt the following measures:
Through these measures, you can significantly reduce the risk of unauthorized access or physical damage to hardware devices.
In digital asset management, you must establish comprehensive emergency response and backup mechanisms. It is recommended to:
Through scientific backup and emergency planning, you can maximize asset security and business continuity in the event of attacks, device damage, or natural disasters.
In digital asset management, you must always remember: never trust any code. Code vulnerabilities, automated attacks, and dependency risks persist. Only cold wallets and hardware authentication devices can effectively isolate private keys and prevent phishing and malware attacks. You can enhance asset security through the following measures:
You should also implement comprehensive monitoring, deploy automated threat detection, conduct regular security audits, and continuously follow digital asset security developments. Continuous learning and improving security awareness enable you to proactively defend against emerging threats and truly put security first.
You can understand a cold wallet as a method of offline private key storage, while a hardware wallet is a dedicated device with physical isolation and secure chips that can prevent malware attacks.
You will find that code auditing can only detect some vulnerabilities—both automated tools and manual review may miss complex logic or hidden backdoors. Asset security still requires multi-layered protection.
You should prioritize purchasing hardware wallets from official channels, check packaging integrity, and avoid third-party supply chain risks. It is recommended to regularly update firmware to ensure device security.
You can use hot wallets for daily small payments and fast transactions. Hot wallets are convenient but carry higher risk—not recommended for long-term storage of large amounts of assets.
You should immediately freeze related accounts, contact platform customer service, and check backups and recovery phrases. It is recommended to prepare an emergency plan in advance to improve asset recovery efficiency.
*This article is provided for general information purposes and does not constitute legal, tax or other professional advice from BiyaPay or its subsidiaries and its affiliates, and it is not intended as a substitute for obtaining advice from a financial advisor or any other professional.
We make no representations, warranties or warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of the contents of this publication.

