
Image Source: pexels
The complex Hong Kong stocks market trends are jointly determined by three core pillars: global liquidity, China’s economic fundamentals, and a unique investor structure. The performance of mainland China’s economy is the cornerstone influencing Hong Kong stocks. Chinese government’s economic decisions directly affect corporate performance and may trigger market fluctuations.
Mainland Chinese companies currently account for 60% of the total value of stocks listed in Hong Kong.
This close connection, combined with the low correlation between China’s A-shares and global stock markets (correlation coefficient of 0.34 over the past decade), jointly shapes the unique operating logic of the Hong Kong market.

Image Source: unsplash
If China’s fundamentals determine the earnings base of Hong Kong-listed companies, then global liquidity, especially USD liquidity, is the key valve determining the valuation levels of Hong Kong stocks. The core of this mechanism lies in Hong Kong’s unique institutional arrangements. Understanding how this valve operates is key to deciphering short-term fluctuations in Hong Kong stock trends.
Hong Kong has implemented the linked exchange rate system since 1983, pegging the Hong Kong dollar to the USD. This is a robust currency board arrangement.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) maintains the HKD/USD exchange rate within a narrow band of 7.75 to 7.85 through an automatic conversion mechanism. When the rate hits the strong side (7.75), the HKMA sells HKD; when it hits the weak side (7.85), it buys HKD.
This system means Hong Kong’s monetary policy has essentially given up independence, with its interest rates and liquidity environment passively following the Federal Reserve’s pace.
When the Federal Reserve enters a rate hike cycle, the attractiveness of the USD increases. This creates an interest rate differential between USD and HKD, attracting funds for arbitrage trades: borrowing low-interest HKD to buy high-interest USD. This behavior triggers capital outflow, pressuring the HKD exchange rate. To defend the linked exchange rate, the HKMA must buy HKD in the market, reducing local fund supply and pushing up the Hong Kong Interbank Offered Rate (HIBOR). Rising funding costs directly pressure stock valuations, leading to a downward shift in overall market P/E ratios. The rate hike cycle starting in 2022 is a typical example.
Conversely, when the Federal Reserve enters a rate cut cycle or implements quantitative easing (QE), the situation reverses.
For example, after the Federal Reserve’s sharp rate cuts and large-scale QE in 2020, abundant liquidity significantly boosted the Hong Kong stock market. Similarly, at the end of 2022, market expectations of the Fed slowing rate hikes became a key factor driving the strong rebound in the Hang Seng Index.

Image Source: pexels
If global liquidity determines the “valuation ceiling” for Hong Kong stocks, then China’s economic fundamentals are the ballast stone determining the “earnings base” for Hong Kong companies. Most companies in the Hong Kong stock market have their core businesses and profit sources in mainland China. Therefore, the health of China’s economy directly determines these companies’ profitability, dominating the medium- to long-term trends of Hong Kong stocks.
The earnings performance of Hong Kong-listed companies is highly correlated with mainland China’s economic growth (GDP), inflation levels, and other macro indicators. Especially for Chinese-funded stocks (H-shares, red chips, etc.) that dominate the market, their revenue and profit growth almost entirely depend on mainland China’s market performance. When China’s economy grows rapidly, corporate sales are strong, earnings expectations improve, providing the most solid support for stock price rises.
Hong Kong stock trends show obvious synchronization with mainland China’s economic cycles. During economic expansion periods, corporate earnings generally improve, investor confidence strengthens, pushing the market into an upward channel. Conversely, during economic slowdown or contraction periods, earnings forecasts are downgraded, market sentiment turns pessimistic, pressuring stock prices. Changes in earnings expectations are the core force driving medium- to long-term Hong Kong stock trends.
Macroeconomic policies and industry regulatory policies from mainland China can transmit directly and rapidly to the Hong Kong stock market, exerting significant impact on stock prices and valuation logic in specific sectors.
In 2021, regulatory policy adjustments targeting certain industries were a vivid example. These changes triggered investors’ reassessment of risks, leading to sell-offs of related Chinese stocks.
The Hong Kong H-share market had up to 30% risk exposure to the then-affected online education and internet industries, while China’s A-share market had less than 0.1% exposure.
Similarly, the “three red lines” policy for the real estate industry directly impacted the fundamentals of related listed companies. The policy strictly limited financing for high-debt developers. Companies like China Evergrande Group, which breached all red lines, quickly faced liquidity exhaustion, ultimately defaulting on over $300 billion in massive debt. This policy also caused offshore bond market defaults in 2021 to surge from near zero to over $12 billion.
The Hong Kong stock market is a unique intersection, gathering two major investment forces from global and mainland China. These two forces have different information advantages, risk preferences, and valuation systems, and their mutual game jointly shapes the market’s complex dynamics and sentiment fluctuations.
Overseas investors typically view Hong Kong stocks from a global asset allocation perspective. They are accustomed to cross-market comparisons, weighing Hong Kong stocks against other emerging or even developed markets. Geopolitical risks, capital mobility, and financial transparency are their core concerns.
Many international investors focus on the following factors when making decisions:
- Uncertainty from geopolitical tensions.
- Convenience of capital freely entering and exiting the market.
- Whether company financial data follows international standards (such as IFRS or GAAP).
This global comparison perspective makes them particularly sensitive to valuations. When Chinese tech companies’ valuations are far below U.S. peers, it may attract their attention.
| Company Type | Forward P/E Ratio |
|---|---|
| U.S. Tech Companies | Approximately 27x |
| Chinese Tech Companies | Approximately 12x |
However, concerns about potential risks also lead them to demand higher risk premiums, thereby lowering the valuation levels they are willing to pay.
Mainland investors flowing south through channels like “Stock Connect” bring a different perspective. Being in mainland China, they have deeper understanding of local industry policies, market environment, and corporate culture. This “local advantage” allows them to better grasp the intrinsic value and growth potential of Chinese companies, sometimes willing to pay premiums for high-quality scarce targets.
The game between these two types of investors makes Hong Kong market sentiment highly volatile. Overseas investors’ pessimism may lead to sustained valuation pressure, while mainland investors’ optimism may bring phased recovery rallies. This tug-of-war is an important dimension for understanding short-term fluctuations in Hong Kong stock trends.
Hong Kong stocks are simultaneously influenced by A-shares and U.S. stocks. The pricing of the same company in Hong Kong (H-shares) and mainland China (A-shares) often differs, measured by the Hang Seng AH Share Premium Index. Historically, A-shares have long had a premium over H-shares, but recently this premium has fallen to low levels, showing changes in investor preferences between the two markets. This price difference provides opportunities for arbitrageurs and causes mutual transmission of market sentiment between the two locations, jointly affecting the stock prices of companies listed in Hong Kong.
Understanding complex Hong Kong stock trends lies in grasping the dynamic balance of the three foundations. Investors should base their decisions on this analytical framework, combined with the current market environment, to make more rational investment choices.
- Global Liquidity: The market expects Federal Reserve rate cuts to attract international capital, but the timing and pace of rate cuts remain uncertain.
- China Fundamentals: Corporate earnings prospects are closely linked to China’s economy, with institutions like UBS predicting slower future growth.
- Investor Structure: Mainland Chinese funds’ influence has significantly increased, with over US$104 billion flowing in through interconnection mechanisms in 2025.
Hong Kong implements a linked exchange rate system, pegging the HKD to the USD. This makes Hong Kong’s interest rates follow the Federal Reserve’s pace. Fed rate hikes or cuts directly change global capital flows and costs, profoundly affecting Hong Kong stock market valuation levels and sentiment.
The core difference between the two lies in investor structure and liquidity environment.
Hong Kong stocks are an internationalized market, with valuations significantly influenced by global liquidity. A-shares are dominated by mainland Chinese investors, with market operations more reflecting local funds and sentiment. This leads to frequent pricing differences for the same company in the two markets.
Investors typically focus on three core elements:
This index measures the price difference of the same company in A-shares and H-shares. An index above 100 indicates A-shares are more expensive than H-shares; below 100 is the opposite. It reflects different valuations and preferences of investors in the two markets for the same asset, serving as a window to observe market sentiment.
*This article is provided for general information purposes and does not constitute legal, tax or other professional advice from BiyaPay or its subsidiaries and its affiliates, and it is not intended as a substitute for obtaining advice from a financial advisor or any other professional.
We make no representations, warranties or warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of the contents of this publication.



