
Image Source: pexels
Sending the same $10,000 from China to the US, one user ended up with over $100 more in the recipient’s account using Wise compared to a bank wire. How did this happen?
Many people find that for remittances within the personal annual quota, choosing a compliant third-party platform is a shortcut to low-cost international remittances. These platforms not only cost less but are often faster. A smart choice maximizes every penny, delivering real surprises to the recipient.

Image Source: unsplash
To achieve low-cost international remittances, you first need to unveil the mystery of remittance costs. Many focus only on the fees quoted at the bank counter, overlooking those hidden in exchange rates and intermediary links. In reality, total costs consist of three parts—understanding them is the first step to making a smart choice.
These are the most straightforward fees, usually clearly stated by the bank when processing the remittance.
Using two major Chinese banks as examples, their fee structures clearly illustrate these visible fees.
| Bank Name | Handling Fee (% of Transfer Amount) | Minimum Handling Fee | Maximum Handling Fee | Cable Charge | Full Amount Arrival Service Fee |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) | 0.1% | 30 USD | 150 USD | 15 USD | 25 USD |
| Bank of China | 0.1% | 50 USD | 200 USD | 20 USD | Not Applicable |
This is the largest and most easily overlooked cost in international remittances. The exchange rate people see online is usually the “mid-market rate”—the benchmark for interbank transactions. However, banks offer individuals the “bank selling rate,” which is higher than the mid-market rate. The difference between the two is the bank’s profit and the hidden cost borne by the remitter. This margin seems small but accumulates into a significant expense for large remittances.
When remitting from China to the US, funds typically do not reach the recipient bank directly. They pass through one or more “correspondent banks” for clearing and routing. These correspondent banks deduct a service fee, usually between 15 USD and 25 USD.
Note: This fee is often unpredictable. It is deducted directly from the principal, meaning the recipient receives less than the initially sent amount—this is the main reason many are confused about the final arrival amount.
Theoretical knowledge is foundational, but real cases reveal the truth more clearly. Let’s follow one user’s remittance journey, simulating sending funds from China to ensure the US recipient receives exactly $10,000, and see the cost differences across channels. This comparison will clearly show how a smart choice creates more value for the recipient.
One user plans to wire funds through a major commercial bank, aiming for the US recipient to receive a full $10,000.
The entire process is full of uncertainty.
Converted at 7.25, this visible fee is about 57 USD.
To ensure the final arrival of $10,000, the user must send more to cover these fees.
Ultimately, to get $10,000 to the recipient, the user’s total cost reaches 77 USD, with ongoing concerns about the final arrival amount and timing.
Another user chooses Wise for the same goal. They find the process transparent and efficient, with full control at every step.
Wise’s model completely changes the game.
The user enters the desired recipient amount in Wise’s calculator: 10,000 USD. The system automatically calculates the total payment.
This user not only precisely controls the arrival amount but enjoys faster speed and lower overall costs, successfully achieving low-cost international remittance.
Side-by-side comparison of the two channels makes the differences crystal clear. This is not just a numerical gap but a massive improvement in the remittance experience.
| Comparison Item | Traditional Bank Wire | Third-Party Platform Wise | Conclusion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exchange Rate | Bank selling rate (with hidden costs) | Mid-market rate (no markup) | Wise wins |
| Total Fees | Approx. 77 USD (handling + cable + correspondent) | Approx. 71 USD (one-time service fee) | Wise wins |
| Arrival Time | 3-5 business days | 1-2 business days | Wise wins |
| Certainty | Arrival amount and time uncertain | Arrival amount and time precisely controllable | Wise wins |
| Total Cost for $10,000 Arrival | Approx. 10,077 USD | 10,071 USD | Wise lower cost |
This table clearly shows that choosing Wise not only saves about 6 USD in fees but, more importantly, eliminates uncertainty from exchange rate losses and correspondent deductions. For those pursuing efficiency and maximum fund value, this is undoubtedly an inspiring choice.

Image Source: unsplash
After mastering cost components, users can tailor the best remittance strategy to their specific needs. Different scenarios require different solutions. A smart plan helps users maximize fund efficiency under compliance, making every cross-border transfer confident.
For student tuition payments, family living expense transfers, and other small but frequent remittances, third-party platforms are undoubtedly the top choice for low-cost international remittances.
These platforms simplify complex processes, letting users easily control funds and provide stable support for overseas life.
When remittance amounts exceed the personal annual $50,000 quota, such as for US real estate investments, compliance becomes the top priority. Here, banks’ compliance assurance stands out.
Users need to submit a written application to the local State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) for approval. This typically requires detailed documentation, such as:
- Proof of fund source (e.g., income tax returns, property sale proofs)
- Contracts with foreign companies
- Recipient’s tax documents
Though the process is more complex, it ensures the legality and safety of large fund transfers—an essential step for major financial goals.
Beyond choosing the right platform, mastering practical tips can further optimize the low-cost international remittance experience. A key tip is “timing the remittance.”
Users should note that banks stop processing on weekends and public holidays (in both China and the US). To avoid unnecessary delays, the best practice is to initiate remittances early on business days. Additionally, platforms like Biyapay and CurrencyFair may offer competitive rates through different models. Spending a few minutes comparing options before remitting always yields surprises.
For regular remittances within the $50,000 quota, prioritizing compliant third-party platforms like Wise maximizes arrival amounts and saves time. A smart move is to open both the bank app and platform calculator before the next remittance and use real-time data to make the best decision. This ensures every penny delivers maximum value.
Safety First: Users must confirm the chosen platform holds relevant financial regulatory licenses. For example, in the US, registration with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) is required; in China, People’s Bank of China approval is needed to ensure absolute fund safety.
Users can be completely assured with compliant platforms. Platforms like Wise hold financial regulatory licenses in multiple countries or regions. They adhere to strict fund safety rules. Every remittance is protected, providing a solid guarantee for fund security.
Yes, all personal remittances from mainland China must comply with foreign exchange regulations.
Each person has an annual FX purchase and remittance quota of 50,000 USD. Compliant third-party platforms operate within this framework, ensuring every operation is legal and compliant, making the remittance process worry-free.
These platforms optimize remittance paths through innovative methods. They maintain local bank account networks globally, so funds do not require multiple hops through the traditional SWIFT network. This peer-to-peer clearing model greatly shortens in-transit time, allowing recipients to receive funds faster.
*This article is provided for general information purposes and does not constitute legal, tax or other professional advice from BiyaPay or its subsidiaries and its affiliates, and it is not intended as a substitute for obtaining advice from a financial advisor or any other professional.
We make no representations, warranties or warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of the contents of this publication.



