
Image Source: pexels
Do you want to use stablecoins (USDT) for remittances to avoid the approximately 6.62% high fees of traditional services? But you may also worry about the risks involved. Digital currency remittances are developing rapidly, and understanding how they work is crucial.
The key to safe, low-cost remittances lies in: choosing reliable trading platforms, verifying counterparties, and using compliant withdrawal channels. This guide will provide you with a clear operation manual in Q&A format.

Image Source: pexels
When considering stablecoin (USDT) remittances, the most direct motivation may be cost. How significant is its advantage compared to traditional bank wire transfers? Let’s answer this with a clear comparison.
The fee structure of traditional bank international wire transfers is complex, often including hidden costs you cannot see. The final fee for a remittance may consist of the following parts:
In contrast, the cost structure of stablecoin (USDT) remittances is much simpler, mainly including network transfer fees, trading platform fees, and spreads when buying/selling USDT.
To make it more intuitive, assume remitting 1,000 USD:
| Fee Type | Bank Wire Transfer (Estimate) | USDT Remittance (Estimate) |
|---|---|---|
| Remittance Handling Fee | $20 - $45 | $0 |
| Intermediary/Correspondent Fee | $15 - $50 | $0 |
| Network/Miner Fee | $0 | $1 - $2 (using TRC-20) |
| Exchange/Spread Loss | 1% - 3% ($10 - $30) | 0.5% - 1% ($5 - $10) |
| Total Cost | $45 - $125 | $6 - $12 |
Tip: From the table above, the total cost of stablecoin (USDT) remittances is significantly lower than bank wire transfers, especially in small to medium remittance scenarios, where the cost advantage is very obvious.
Choosing the right transfer network is a key step to control USDT remittance costs. The two most mainstream networks currently are TRC-20 (TRON network) and ERC-20 (Ethereum network).
For most remittance needs, the TRC-20 network is the most cost-effective choice. Fortunately, almost all mainstream trading platforms now support both networks, allowing you to choose flexibly based on your needs. Additionally, other stablecoins like USDC and DAI can also be remittance options, usually efficiently exchangeable through decentralized platforms.

Image Source: unsplash
While enjoying the low costs and high efficiency of stablecoin (USDT) remittances, you must clearly recognize the hidden risks. Understanding these risks and learning prevention is a required course to ensure your fund safety.
“Black USDT” refers to illegally sourced USDT, such as from online gambling, scams, money laundering, and other criminal activities. When selling USDT through P2P transactions, if you receive such “dirty money,” your bank account may be frozen by judicial authorities.
Bank account freezes due to receiving illicit funds from P2P transactions are a common issue. Once your receiving account is linked to involved funds, even if you personally did not participate in any illegal activities, law enforcement may freeze your account for investigation. Although it can eventually be unfrozen, the process is very time-consuming and troublesome.
Important Tip: Do not think account freezes are far from you. The following are real judicial cases where bank accounts were frozen due to receiving illegal funds, reminding us to take fund source compliance seriously.
| Case Name | Date |
|---|---|
| Superintedent of Police vs Devaki Muthiah | April 15, 2019 |
| Superintendent of police vs shera f Irani | N/A |
| Tmt.T.Subbulakshmi vs The Commissioner Of Police | August 30, 2013 |
| J. Alice Mary vs The Inspector Of Police | July 3, 2007 |
| Uma Maheswari vs The State Rep. By | December 20, 2013 |
How to Prevent “Black USDT” Risks?
Although P2P transactions are convenient, they also provide opportunities for scammers. Be alert to the following common scams:
Offline Transaction Warning: In offline cash transactions, be especially vigilant of “middleman” scams. If the other party claims a friend or colleague will handle the transaction, this is a strong danger signal. You must verify the other party’s username and transaction number on the P2P platform in person to ensure you are trading with the correct party.
How to Prevent P2P Scams?
A core feature of blockchain transactions is “irreversibility.” Once you send USDT to the wrong address or choose the wrong network, funds are likely permanently lost. The losses from such errors can be huge.
According to the FBI report, cryptocurrency-related fraud caused nearly 4 billion USD in investor losses in 2023 alone. Losses due to operational errors account for a significant portion. For example, a trader copied and pasted the wrong address and transferred out $843,000 and $1.75 million within three hours, totaling about $2.6 million in losses. Even worse, due to an “address poisoning” scam (scammers create an address very similar to your commonly used one), a trader lost assets worth nearly 70 million USD.
Can a wrong transfer be recovered?
Although difficult, there is still a glimmer of hope in certain situations:
How to Prevent Operational Errors from the Root?
After mastering risk prevention knowledge, you need a clear, executable operation process to ensure every step is safe. At the same time, understanding related legal and tax regulations allows you to enjoy convenience while avoiding unnecessary troubles.
Follow these steps to greatly reduce risks in the stablecoin (USDT) remittance process.
Operation Example: You can use an app like BiyaPay with licenses such as US MSB to convert USDT in your wallet to USD, then withdraw to your own Wise or Hong Kong licensed bank account. This process isolates your bank account from direct contact with P2P counterparties, greatly reducing risk control issues.
The regulatory environment in the cryptocurrency field is changing rapidly, and you must stay informed.
Important: If filing taxes in the US, use Form 8949 to calculate capital gains or losses and report on Schedule D. Be sure to keep all transaction records for accurate tax filing.
Stablecoin remittances do have advantages in cost and efficiency, but opportunities and risks coexist. Remember, your risk prevention awareness is more important than any technique, and “safety first” is the eternal principle.
Ultimate Pitfall Avoidance Advice
- Platforms and Counterparties: You should only trust top platforms and verified merchants.
- Verification and Checking: Repeatedly verify addresses before transferring, and confirm bank funds have arrived when receiving.
- Isolation and Compliance: You can use dedicated bank accounts or compliant third-party apps (such as licensed apps) for withdrawals to isolate risks, and proactively understand local regulations through official channels like IRS.
Of course. You can also choose stablecoins like USDC or DAI. They are generally considered more transparent and widely supported by mainstream exchanges and wallets, making them reliable remittance alternatives.
The entire process time consists of multiple links. Blockchain transfers themselves are fast, usually taking just a few minutes. But buying/selling stablecoins and final bank withdrawal processing may take from tens of minutes to several hours.
You should honestly state that the funds come from personal asset exchanges. Be sure to keep complete transaction records, such as withdrawal certificates from compliant platforms. This helps prove your fund source is legal and avoids unnecessary troubles.
Stablecoin transfers themselves have no upper limit. However, the trading platform you use will set daily withdrawal limits based on your identity verification (KYC) level. For large remittances, confirm the platform’s specific limits in advance.
*This article is provided for general information purposes and does not constitute legal, tax or other professional advice from BiyaPay or its subsidiaries and its affiliates, and it is not intended as a substitute for obtaining advice from a financial advisor or any other professional.
We make no representations, warranties or warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of the contents of this publication.



