
Image Source: pexels
Stablecoin cross-border remittances provide individuals and businesses with near-instant fund transfer solutions, with costs far lower than traditional banks. Users can complete settlements in minutes, while traditional wire transfers take several business days.
| Metric | Stablecoin Remittance | Traditional Banking System |
|---|---|---|
| Transaction Speed | Settlement in minutes | 3-5 business days |
| Transaction Cost | Usually below 1% | 2%-7% |
However, enjoying these conveniences requires properly addressing complex global regulatory and tax challenges. This guide aims to provide a clear compliance path to help users safely navigate this legal and tax maze.

Image Source: unsplash
As stablecoin cross-border remittances become increasingly popular, global regulators are accelerating the construction of clear legal frameworks. Users and platforms must understand and comply with these core compliance requirements to ensure the legality and safety of operations. Non-compliant operations not only face huge fines but may also lead to criminal liability.
Major global economies are shifting their regulatory stance on stablecoins from observation to active legislation. Understanding the latest dynamics in these key jurisdictions is crucial.
European Union (EU): Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) MiCA is the world’s first comprehensive regulatory framework for crypto assets, which took effect for stablecoins on June 30, 2024. It sets unified rules for the issuance and trading of stablecoins.
Hong Kong: New Stablecoin Ordinance The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) has launched a mandatory licensing system for stablecoin issuers to integrate stablecoins into the mainstream financial system.
Any entity issuing stablecoins in Hong Kong or promoting HKD-pegged stablecoins to the Hong Kong public must meet the following strict requirements:
United States: Legislation Still in Progress The U.S. Congress is actively advancing stablecoin legislation to establish a clear federal regulatory framework for payment stablecoins. Multiple bill drafts (such as the GENIUS Act) reveal future regulatory directions:
- Prohibit issuers from paying interest to holders to distinguish from bank deposits.
- Impose bank-like prudential regulatory requirements on stablecoin issuers.
- Reserve power for federal regulators (such as the Fed) to take enforcement action against state-level issuers in emergencies.
Singapore: MAS Stablecoin Regulatory Framework The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) released its regulatory framework in August 2023, aiming to promote stablecoins as trusted digital media of exchange.
- Scope: Applies to single-currency stablecoins (SCS) issued in Singapore and pegged to the Singapore dollar or any G10 currency.
- Core Requirements: Issuers must meet strict value stability, capital adequacy, and face-value redemption requirements.
- “MAS Regulated” Label: Only fully compliant stablecoins can obtain the “MAS regulated stablecoin” label to help users identify regulated assets.
The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) report notes that illegal activities involving stablecoins continue to increase, including terrorism financing and drug trafficking. Therefore, stablecoin transactions are viewed as high-risk areas by global regulators and must comply with strict AML/CTF regulations.
This means stablecoin issuers and trading platforms, as virtual asset service providers (VASPs), must fulfill the following obligations:
Enforcement Warning: Severe Consequences of Non-Compliance
Regulators have taken severe action against non-compliant platforms. For example, one of the world’s largest stablecoin issuers, Tether, is under investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice for alleged AML violations. Additionally, the TGR Group was found using stablecoins to launder money for Russian elites. These cases show regulators’ zero-tolerance attitude toward using stablecoins for illegal activities.
KYC (Know Your Customer) and the Travel Rule are the two core pillars of the AML/CTF compliance framework.
KYC (Know Your Customer) KYC is the identity verification process financial institutions must perform before establishing a business relationship. For stablecoin platforms, this usually means collecting and verifying the following user information:
Platforms must also screen customers against official sanctions lists and politically exposed persons (PEP) lists and continuously monitor their account activities.
Travel Rule The Travel Rule requires virtual asset service providers (VASPs) to obtain, hold, and exchange information about both parties to a transaction when processing transactions above a certain threshold. FATF has explicitly stated that stablecoins are virtual assets, and their service providers must comply with this rule.
Thresholds vary by jurisdiction:
| Jurisdiction | Transaction Threshold |
|---|---|
| United States | Over $3,000 USD |
| European Union | No threshold (from €0) |
| Canada | No threshold (from CAD 0) |
This means that when a user sends stablecoins from one exchange to another, both platforms need to share user identity:user identity information to ensure transparency of fund flows and prevent anonymous illegal transfers.

Image Source: pexels
In addition to complex legal frameworks, taxation is the compliance area most easily overlooked by stablecoin users. Many users mistakenly believe that since stablecoins are pegged to fiat currency, their transactions are not taxable. However, most tax authorities worldwide disagree. Understanding the tax treatment of stablecoins is a key step to ensuring fund security and avoiding high penalties.
The core of tax treatment lies first in characterization. Although stablecoins functionally mimic currency, under tax law, they are usually classified into a completely different category.
Core Point: Stablecoins are “Property”, Not “Currency”
According to official guidance from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS), all digital assets, including stablecoins, are treated as “property” for federal tax purposes. This means the general tax principles applicable to property transactions also apply to stablecoins.
This characterization has decisive implications:
The IRS explicitly lists stablecoins alongside convertible virtual currencies, cryptocurrencies, and NFTs in its publications, all as digital representations of value recorded on encrypted secure distributed ledgers. Therefore, users must answer questions about digital asset transactions on Form 1040 (U.S. individual income tax return) and report all related income.
When a stablecoin transaction is treated as a property disposition, its capital gains or losses need to be calculated. The calculation follows a standard formula.
Capital Gains Calculation Formula: Capital Gain/Loss = Proceeds - Cost Basis
Here are several common taxable scenarios:
| Transaction Scenario | Is It a Taxable Event? | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Purchasing stablecoins with fiat | No | This transaction establishes your “cost basis.” For example, buying 1,000 USDC with $1,000 sets your cost basis at $1,000. |
| Exchanging one cryptocurrency for stablecoins | Yes | This is one of the most common taxable events. You are effectively “selling” the cryptocurrency. |
| Exchanging stablecoins for another cryptocurrency | Yes | You are effectively “selling” the stablecoin to acquire the new asset. |
| Exchanging stablecoins for fiat | Yes | You complete the disposition of the asset and need to calculate gains or losses. |
Example: Conversion from Bitcoin to Stablecoin
Suppose a user purchased 1 Bitcoin for $10,000 in January 2022. In February 2023, he exchanged this Bitcoin for 20,000 USDT.
- Cost Basis: $10,000 (original price of purchasing Bitcoin)
- Proceeds: $20,000 (fair market value of USDT received at exchange)
- Capital Gain: $20,000 - $10,000 = $10,000
This $10,000 gain needs to be reported. Since the holding period exceeds one year, it is classified as long-term capital gain, typically subject to preferential rates lower than ordinary income tax (0%, 15%, or 20% in the U.S.). If held for less than one year, it is short-term capital gain, taxed at the user’s ordinary income tax rate (up to 37%).
In stablecoin cross-border remittances, simply transferring stablecoins from one wallet to another under your control usually does not constitute a taxable event. However, if the remittance involves exchanging one cryptocurrency for stablecoins or the recipient exchanging stablecoins for local fiat, these steps may trigger tax obligations.
Accurate tax reporting is built on detailed records. Failure to properly maintain records or intentional concealment can lead to severe legal consequences.
Transaction Records That Must Be Kept To ensure tax compliance, users must record the following key information for every stablecoin transaction:
Tax Reporting and Potential Penalties In the U.S., taxpayers need to use Form 8949 (Sales and Other Dispositions of Capital Assets) to report each transaction in detail, then summarize total capital gains or losses on Schedule D (Form 1040).
Warning: Severe Consequences of Tax Evasion
Tax authorities are intensifying crackdowns on digital asset tax evasion. In the U.S., unreported or inaccurate transaction reporting may face:
- Accuracy-Related Penalties: Typically 20% of the underreported tax amount.
- Civil Penalties: If deemed fraudulent, penalties may be higher, even up to civil fines of $100,000.
- Criminal Charges: In extreme cases, intentional tax evasion can lead to up to five years in prison.
Therefore, whether individuals or businesses, tax compliance should be considered an indispensable part of using stablecoins for any transactions (including cross-border remittances). Using professional crypto tax software or consulting a tax advisor is a wise move to ensure accurate reporting.
Theoretical knowledge ultimately needs to be implemented in practice. Following a clear guide can help users enjoy the convenience of stablecoins while effectively avoiding legal and tax risks.
Choosing the right tools is the first step in compliance. A compliant platform not only secures funds but also simplifies tax reporting. When selecting a trading platform or service provider (such as Biyapay), users should check whether it meets the following core compliance standards:
For stablecoin selection, prioritize those with transparent reserves, audited, and issued by reputable entities, such as USDC or USDT.
A compliant stablecoin cross-border remittance typically follows these steps:
Many users fall into a serious tax misconception when using stablecoins for small, frequent payments: neglecting record-keeping.
Tax Warning:Missing Records Are the Biggest Trap
The most common tax error for individuals using stablecoins for small, frequent cross-border payments is failing to properly keep detailed records of each transaction. Since tax authorities (such as the IRS) tend to use the First-In, First-Out (FIFO) method to calculate cost basis when unable to identify specific asset batches, this may result in higher taxable gains than actual.
To avoid tax errors, users must keep detailed records of all stablecoin transactions, including transaction date, amount, wallet address, and fair market value in USD at the time of transaction.
The technical advantages of stablecoin cross-border remittances must be built on strict legal and tax compliance. Users must proactively understand and comply with local regulations, choose regulated tools, and properly handle taxes. The consequences of ignoring compliance are severe, as historical cases have fully proven.
| Stablecoin/Company | Violation | Consequences |
|---|---|---|
| Paxos (BUSD issuer) | Weakened AML/KYC program | $48.5 million fine |
| Terraform Labs (UST) | Algorithmic stablecoin collapse | Approx. $40 billion market loss |
| Tether (USDT) | Funds linked to illegal activities | Over $225 million in assets frozen |
Call to Action Before conducting large or commercial remittances, be sure to consult professional legal and tax advisors to ensure everything is foolproof.
Generally, merely holding assets does not trigger a taxable event. Tax obligations usually arise when selling, exchanging, or otherwise disposing of stablecoins. However, specific rules vary by jurisdiction, and users should consult professional tax advisors for accurate information.
Yes. All transactions must comply with anti-money laundering (AML) regulations. Although some rules (such as the Travel Rule) have transaction thresholds, basic compliance requirements like KYC apply to all users. Platforms must monitor all transaction activities to prevent illegal fund flows.
Yes, it is possible. Although stablecoins are designed to maintain a fixed value, market fluctuations or transaction fees may cause the sale price to be lower than the cost basis. For example, a user buys in at $1,000 but ultimately recovers only $995 due to fees, resulting in a $5 capital loss.
No. Compliant virtual asset service providers (VASPs) must execute strict KYC processes and comply with the Travel Rule. These measures aim to eliminate anonymous transactions, ensure transparency of fund flows, and effectively prevent illegal activities such as money laundering.
*This article is provided for general information purposes and does not constitute legal, tax or other professional advice from BiyaPay or its subsidiaries and its affiliates, and it is not intended as a substitute for obtaining advice from a financial advisor or any other professional.
We make no representations, warranties or warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of the contents of this publication.



