
Image Source: pexels
Using stablecoins to remit to the US may have a lower total cost for small payments than traditional bank wire transfers. But this is not an absolute money-saving secret. This method is more complex to operate and comes with specific platform, operational, and compliance risks.
When you see advertisements claiming “network fee only $1,” have you ever thought about the hidden additional costs behind it? To save a few dozen dollars, is it worth taking on potential fund risks?

Image Source: pexels
To figure out which method saves more money, you need to first understand the fees for each link in the two remittance paths. We will use a remittance of $5,000 as an example to break down all costs for you.
When you wire transfer from a bank in mainland China to a US bank account, you pay far more than just the handling fee shown at the counter. The total cost usually consists of the following four parts:
Case Calculation: Total Cost of Wiring $5,000 Assuming handling fee $20 + cable fee $15 + intermediary bank fee $25 + exchange rate loss $25, the total cost to remit $5,000 is approximately $85. The final amount received may only be $4,915.
The process of remitting to the US using stablecoins is more like a “triple jump,” with corresponding costs at each step. We will also analyze with $5,000 as an example.
Step 1: Buying USDT with RMB (Deposit Cost)
You cannot directly buy USDT with RMB on mainstream cryptocurrency exchanges. You need to go through the C2C (Customer-to-Customer) market to find individual merchants willing to sell USDT, then pay RMB to them via bank transfer or Alipay.
Step 2: Transferring USDT from Exchange to Withdrawal Platform (Network Fee)
After purchasing USDT, you need to withdraw it from the exchange wallet and transfer it to a platform that can convert it to USD (such as Coinbase or BiyaPay). This process incurs a “network fee” (Gas Fee).
💡 Tip: Choosing the right network is crucial TRON (TRC-20) and Solana networks are currently the lowest-cost options for transferring USDT. Fees are usually around $1, far lower than the dozens of dollars on the Ethereum (ERC-20) network.
Network USDT Token Standard (Protocol) Fee Amount TRON TRC-20 Approx. $0.3 - $2 Solana SOL Approx. $0.004
Therefore, the cost of this step can be controlled at around $1.
Step 3: Converting USDT to USD and Withdrawing to US Bank Account (Withdrawal Cost)
This is the final and most complex step in cost structure. Taking apps like BiyaPay that support cryptocurrency withdrawals as an example, the costs mainly consist of two parts:
Case Calculation: Total Cost of USDT Remittance for $5,000 Assuming C2C premium $75 + network fee $1 + BiyaPay trading fee $50 + ACH free withdrawal, total cost is approximately $126.
From the $5,000 case comparison above, you will find that USDT remittance (cost $126) is actually more expensive than traditional wire transfer (cost $85). Why is that?
The key lies in the different cost structures:
This means that for very small remittance amounts, the high fixed fees of traditional wire transfers become very uneconomical. As the remittance amount increases, the percentage-based fees of USDT quickly accumulate, making its total cost exceed traditional wire transfer.
Estimated Cost Comparison for Different Amounts
| Remittance Amount | Traditional Wire Estimated Cost | USDT Remittance Estimated Cost | Conclusion |
|---|---|---|---|
| $500 | ~$65 (fixed fees dominate) | ~$26 (1.5% premium + 1% withdrawal) | USDT cheaper |
| $2,000 | ~$75 | ~$51 | USDT cheaper |
| $5,000 | ~$85 | ~$126 | Traditional wire cheaper |
| $10,000 | ~$120 | ~$251 | Traditional wire cheaper |
Note: The above table is a simplified estimation model; actual costs vary by platform, exchange rate, and fee policies.
From the model, you can clearly see that the cost “break-even point” is approximately in the $2,000 to $3,000 range. For small remittances below this amount, USDT does have a cost advantage. Once exceeding this amount, the cost advantage of traditional wire transfer becomes apparent.

Image Source: pexels
After understanding the costs, you may be curious about the operational process of USDT remittance. This process is far more complex than bank wire transfers, and every step comes with risks that require your high vigilance. This section will detail the operational steps for you and deeply analyze the major hidden risks.
The complete path of remitting to the US with stablecoins can be broken down into four core steps. We will use operations on mainstream exchanges (such as OKX) and final withdrawal through apps like BiyaPay as an example to show you the full process.
Step 1: Register Exchange Account and Complete Identity Verification (KYC)
You cannot anonymously purchase cryptocurrencies. All compliant trading platforms require users to complete the “Know Your Customer” (KYC) process to prevent money laundering and financial fraud.
Note: Only after completing identity verification can you conduct C2C transactions, that is, buy USDT with RMB. This process usually takes a few minutes to several hours for review.
Step 2: Buy USDT with RMB via C2C Transaction
After verification, you can enter the platform’s C2C market. Here, you will see many USDT sell ads posted by individual merchants.
Step 3: Withdraw USDT from Exchange to Withdrawal Platform
Now, USDT is in your exchange account. You need to transfer it to a platform that can convert cryptocurrency to USD and withdraw to a US bank account, such as Coinbase or BiyaPay.
Step 4: Convert USDT to USD and Withdraw on the Withdrawal Platform
This is the final step to complete the remittance. You need to sell the received USDT for USD on a platform like BiyaPay, then withdraw to your bound US bank account. We will detail this step in the case analysis below.
Although the process seems clear, every step of remitting to the US with stablecoins hides risks. Once these risks occur, they may lead to permanent loss of your funds.
1. Platform Risk: Withdrawal Blocks and Platform Absconding
The reliability of the withdrawal platform you choose directly determines your fund security. Some small or unknown platforms may pose huge risks.
According to multiple user reports online, some platforms (including BiyaPay) face withdrawal fraud allegations. Users report that when attempting to withdraw large amounts, the platform delays with excuses like “account review” or “system maintenance” and requires payment of additional “taxes” or “service fees” to release funds. However, even if users pay these fees, they ultimately cannot retrieve their money. These are clear warning signs of risky platforms.
2. Operational Risk: Account Freezing and Fund Loss
Severe Warning: If you mistakenly send USDT based on the TRC-20 network to an address based on the ERC-20 network (Ethereum), the funds will be permanently lost, and no one can help you recover them. This simple operational error could cost you the entire remittance.
3. Compliance Risk: Regulatory Violations and Tax Reporting
BiyaPay, as an app supporting cryptocurrency and fiat exchange, is often used as a channel for USDT withdrawal. Below is its officially promoted operational path, but please review it in conjunction with the risks mentioned above.
Reality Check: Although BiyaPay’s official blog claims its transfers are “very fast” and can even achieve “same-day arrival”. But as mentioned in the “Platform Risk” section, numerous negative user reviews indicate that the withdrawal process may be blocked. Therefore, when considering such platforms, you must factor these potential withdrawal failure risks into your decision.
Although using stablecoins to remit to the US can be cheaper in some cases, the risks cannot be ignored. By following the safety guidelines below, you can maximize the protection of your fund security.
Your first line of defense is choosing the right tools.
| Feature | Custodial Wallet (e.g., platform-built wallet) | Non-Custodial Wallet (user-controlled) |
|---|---|---|
| Private Key Management | Platform manages private key for you | You fully control the private key |
| Security | Depends on platform security measures | You bear full responsibility for security |
| Recovery Ability | Forgotten password usually recoverable | Lost seed phrase means permanent fund loss |
For beginners, using a custodial wallet built into a large exchange is more convenient. But you must understand that this means handing control of your funds to the platform.
C2C transactions are the riskiest link; you need to stay vigilant like a detective.
Important Tip: To avoid bank account freezing, never include sensitive words like “USDT” or “Bitcoin” in transfer remarks.
Operational errors can lead to permanent loss of your funds. Strictly follow these steps:
USDT remittance does have a cost advantage in small-amount scenarios, but the operations are complex and carry significant risks.
The US Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) regulations state that individuals using virtual currencies for remittances are generally not considered regulated “money transmission services”.
Nevertheless, after factoring in operational and platform risks, for most people, the “cheaper” USDT is not the “better choice.” Safety is always the first priority in cross-border remittances.
Mainland Chinese law does not prohibit individuals from holding or trading cryptocurrencies. But financial institutions are prohibited from providing related services. Your C2C transaction behavior is in a legal gray area, with certain policy and compliance risks.
You should immediately contact the bank to obtain information about the enforcing authority for the frozen account. Then, proactively cooperate with the investigation, provide transaction records and other evidence to prove the legitimacy of the fund source. This process can be lengthy and complex.
The entire process takes from a few hours to several days.
Yes. USDC is another common USD stablecoin known for its high transparency and compliance. But in the C2C market, USDT’s trading volume and liquidity are usually much higher than USDC, making it easier to buy and sell.
*This article is provided for general information purposes and does not constitute legal, tax or other professional advice from BiyaPay or its subsidiaries and its affiliates, and it is not intended as a substitute for obtaining advice from a financial advisor or any other professional.
We make no representations, warranties or warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of the contents of this publication.



