
Image Source: pexels
The Price-to-Sales Ratio explanation reveals a key metric in the valuation system. For many high-growth or profit-unstable companies, investors often prioritize the Price-to-Sales Ratio. Taking companies like Meituan and Pinduoduo as examples, the market commonly uses the Price-to-Sales Ratio for valuation:
| Company Name | Valuation Method | Remarks | 
|---|---|---|
| Meituan | Price-to-Sales Ratio | High-growth company | 
| Pinduoduo | Price-to-Sales Ratio | High-growth company | 
| Tencent | Price-to-Sales Ratio | Benefits from macroeconomic policies | 
| Alibaba | Price-to-Sales Ratio | Benefits from macroeconomic policies | 
| JD.com | Price-to-Sales Ratio | Benefits from macroeconomic policies | 
Why does the Price-to-Sales Ratio become the preferred choice for investors? How does it differ from the Price-to-Earnings Ratio and Price-to-Book Ratio? These questions are worth exploring in depth.

Image Source: pexels
The Price-to-Sales Ratio explanation begins with understanding its essence. The Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S) is a financial metric that measures the relationship between a company’s market value and its sales revenue. Through the Price-to-Sales Ratio, investors can intuitively understand how much the market is willing to pay for each dollar of a company’s sales. Also known as the “sales multiple,” the Price-to-Sales Ratio has unique advantages in valuing high-growth, loss-making, or profit-unstable companies. Many tech companies in the U.S. market are not yet profitable in their early stages but exhibit rapid revenue growth, and the Price-to-Sales Ratio explanation helps investors better assess the market value of these companies.
The Price-to-Sales Ratio is suitable for the following types of companies:
- High-growth companies with rapidly expanding revenue but not yet profitable
- Innovative companies in the early stages of development
- Companies with significant profit volatility
The table below summarizes the core definition of the Price-to-Sales Ratio:
| Definition | Description | 
|---|---|
| P/S Ratio | Measures the relationship between company value and sales revenue, also known as the “sales multiple” | 
| Calculation Formula | Stock price divided by per-share sales | 
| Investor Perspective | Shows the price investors are willing to pay for the company’s sales (revenue) | 
Many financial textbooks and institutions regard the Price-to-Sales Ratio as an important tool for analyzing high-growth companies. Research shows that the Price-to-Sales Ratio is more useful in evaluating unprofitable or early-stage growth companies because it helps assess value when earnings are minimal or nonexistent. Historical data also indicates that buying stocks with the lowest Price-to-Sales Ratios achieved over 17% compound returns from 1951 to 2003, demonstrating its unique role in valuing high-growth companies.
The calculation method for the Price-to-Sales Ratio is straightforward and intuitive. Investors typically use two approaches:
| Calculation Method | Formula | 
|---|---|
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S) | Latest closing stock price ÷ Per-share sales | 
| Alternative Calculation | Market capitalization ÷ Annual sales | 
Specific steps are as follows:
The Price-to-Sales Ratio explanation emphasizes that a lower P/S value usually indicates that a company is undervalued, meaning investors pay less for each dollar of sales. Conversely, a higher value suggests the market has higher expectations for the company’s future growth. Since 2009, the weighted median Price-to-Sales Ratio for unprofitable companies in the U.S. market has risen from 3.3 to 8.6, while the same ratio for profitable companies only increased from 1.0 to 2.1, reflecting a significant valuation increase for high-growth companies.
It should be noted that the Price-to-Sales Ratio does not account for a company’s financial leverage, cash flow, or intangible assets. Companies with high debt or poor cash flow may have inflated P/S ratios. Additionally, profit margins vary significantly across industries, and comparing P/S ratios alone may lead to misjudgments. Therefore, investors should combine the Price-to-Sales Ratio with other financial metrics for comprehensive analysis.

Image Source: pexels
The Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E) and Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B) are common valuation metrics in investment analysis. The Price-to-Earnings Ratio reflects the price investors are willing to pay for each dollar of net profit and is suitable for mature companies with stable profits. The Price-to-Book Ratio measures the relationship between a company’s market value and its book assets, often used for asset-intensive companies. The core differences between the three lie in their applicable scope and the perspective from which they reflect value.
| Ratio Type | Characteristics | Influencing Factors | 
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S) | Sales revenue is less prone to manipulation, suitable for loss-making companies, but does not account for cost structure differences. | Profit margins, growth rate, required return rate | 
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E) | Influenced by growth expectations, profit fluctuations may lead to inaccurate value reflection. | Earnings per share growth rate | 
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B) | Focuses on the relationship between company assets and market price, but asset values may be inaccurate. | Management of assets and liabilities | 
The Price-to-Earnings Ratio is most commonly used for profitable companies, reflecting market expectations for future earnings. High-growth companies typically have higher P/E ratios. The Price-to-Book Ratio requires comparison with companies in the same industry, as asset and liability management significantly impacts long-term valuation.
The Price-to-Sales Ratio explanation shows that it has unique advantages in high-growth and light-asset companies. Compared to the Price-to-Earnings Ratio and Price-to-Book Ratio, the Price-to-Sales Ratio better reflects the authenticity of revenue. Sales revenue is less prone to manipulation, providing investors with a direct measure of company value relative to revenue. For unprofitable or highly volatile-profit companies, the Price-to-Sales Ratio becomes an important valuation tool.
The Price-to-Sales Ratio explanation also notes that, while it ignores cost structures, it remains a powerful reference for industries with unstable or negative profits.
The Price-to-Sales Ratio explanation shows that sales revenue, as a core component of financial statements, is typically less prone to corporate manipulation. Compared to net profit, sales revenue is less affected by accounting policies. Many companies can influence net profit by adjusting depreciation, amortization, or one-time expenses, but it is difficult to significantly inflate sales without violating accounting standards. Therefore, the Price-to-Sales Ratio explanation becomes an important tool for investors to assess a company’s true operating condition.
In the U.S. market, many high-growth tech companies, such as Meituan, Pinduoduo, and Bilibili, experience significant profit fluctuations or prolonged losses in their early stages. Investors find it challenging to assess their reasonable valuation using traditional metrics like the Price-to-Earnings Ratio. The Price-to-Sales Ratio explanation, by directly comparing market value to sales revenue, helps investors bypass the pitfalls of profit manipulation, providing a more objective measure of a company’s market value. This characteristic makes the Price-to-Sales Ratio indispensable in valuing high-growth, innovative companies.
Revenue stability directly impacts the reliability of the Price-to-Sales Ratio. A stable revenue base provides a more consistent denominator for the Price-to-Sales Ratio, making it a more reliable indicator for assessing company value, especially during periods of profit volatility. When revenue is stable, the Price-to-Sales Ratio can effectively reflect a company’s market position and growth potential, as it is less affected by distorted profit figures. Investors analyzing high-growth companies often face significant profit fluctuations or losses. In such cases, the Price-to-Sales Ratio explanation, by focusing on sales revenue, avoids the challenges of selecting different profit metrics.
Taking U.S. market examples like Meituan and Pinduoduo, both companies were loss-making in their early listing stages but maintained consistent revenue growth. Investors used the Price-to-Sales Ratio to assess their growth potential and market acceptance, avoiding valuation distortions caused by profit fluctuations.
The Price-to-Sales Ratio explanation demonstrates unique advantages in multiple scenarios. High-growth companies, innovative tech firms, and internet platforms with unstable profits are all suitable for valuation using the Price-to-Sales Ratio. Companies with light-asset business models, such as online services, content platforms, and SaaS companies, experience rapid sales revenue growth, with profits heavily influenced by early-stage investments. The Price-to-Sales Ratio helps investors capture the growth potential of these companies.
In the U.S. market, content platform companies like Bilibili incur significant early-stage investments, with profitability yet to materialize. The Price-to-Sales Ratio provides investors with an effective tool to measure their market value. For companies where traditional Price-to-Earnings and Price-to-Book Ratios are less applicable, the Price-to-Sales Ratio explanation serves as a crucial supplement to the valuation system.
While the Price-to-Sales Ratio has unique advantages for high-growth companies, it also has clear limitations. Analysts should note the following when applying it:
When analyzing the Price-to-Sales Ratio, investors are advised to combine industry averages, company size, market share, and other factors and refer to other financial metrics like earnings per share and free cash flow for a more comprehensive judgment.
The Price-to-Sales Ratio is more suitable for the following industries and company types:
| Industry Type | Applicability | 
|---|---|
| Software | High growth, significant profit volatility | 
| Healthcare | Not yet profitable, rapid revenue growth | 
| Retail/Manufacturing | Sales revenue as a core metric | 
| Emerging Tech | Low profit margins, strong growth potential | 
In U.S. market practices, analysts often compare the Price-to-Sales Ratio to industry averages, incorporating industry structure and future growth opportunities to enhance the scientific accuracy of valuation judgments.
Investors typically follow these steps to apply the Price-to-Sales Ratio in investment decisions:
This approach helps investors obtain a more objective valuation reference when dealing with high-growth or profit-unstable companies.
The Price-to-Sales Ratio, as an important tool in investment analysis, should be used in conjunction with other metrics. Investors in the U.S. market commonly use the following strategies:
This integrated analysis approach helps investors more accurately identify a company’s true value and growth potential.
In the U.S. market, investors often use the Price-to-Sales Ratio to screen potential stocks. For example, Kenneth Fisher once used a low Price-to-Sales Ratio to identify a retail company. He further analyzed the company’s management team and business model, discovering its unique competitive advantages. Ultimately, the company transitioned from a value trap to a profitable investment, with the Price-to-Sales Ratio playing a key role in the investment decision.
Such cases demonstrate that the Price-to-Sales Ratio not only helps investors identify undervalued companies but also enhances overall portfolio returns when combined with other metrics.
The Price-to-Sales Ratio holds a significant position in the valuation system, particularly for high-growth or loss-making companies. Investors can improve the scientific accuracy of their analysis by:
Multidimensional analysis helps avoid misjudgments caused by a single metric, improving the accuracy of investment decisions.
The Price-to-Sales Ratio is not suitable for all industries. High-growth, light-asset industries like software, healthcare, and retail are more applicable. For heavy-asset or extremely low-profit-margin industries, the Price-to-Sales Ratio has limited reference value.
A low Price-to-Sales Ratio may indicate undervaluation but could also reflect a lack of growth potential. Investors should combine industry averages and company fundamentals for comprehensive judgment.
Investors often combine the Price-to-Sales Ratio with the Price-to-Earnings Ratio, free cash flow, and other metrics. This allows for a more comprehensive assessment of company value, avoiding misjudgments from a single metric.
The Price-to-Sales Ratio cannot directly reflect profitability. High sales do not equate to high profits. Analysis should also consider profit margins and cash flow data.
U.S. market analysts commonly use the Price-to-Sales Ratio to screen high-growth, unprofitable, or rapidly revenue-growing companies, such as those in technology, the internet, and innovative sectors.
The value of the price-to-sales ratio lies not only in spotting growth opportunities but also in encouraging investors to adopt a balanced view of the market. To move from theory to action, tools and channels matter. With BiyaPay, you can open an account in just three minutes, no overseas bank account required. Stay updated with real-time exchange rates to avoid hidden currency conversion costs, and access global stocks from a single account. Whether funding with USDT for quick deposits, enjoying trading fees as low as 0.5%—saving up to 90% compared with traditional banks—or using zero-fee limit orders for contracts, BiyaPay offers the cost efficiency professional traders seek. With same-day remittance capabilities, your funds can reach their destination quickly, ensuring you never miss a market opportunity. It’s time to connect your analysis with seamless execution.
*This article is provided for general information purposes and does not constitute legal, tax or other professional advice from BiyaPay or its subsidiaries and its affiliates, and it is not intended as a substitute for obtaining advice from a financial advisor or any other professional.
We make no representations, warranties or warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of the contents of this publication.




 Australia
 Australia Austria
 Austria Belgium
 Belgium Canada
 Canada Cyprus
 Cyprus Czech Republic
 Czech Republic Denmark
 Denmark Estonia
 Estonia Finland
 Finland France
 France Germany
 Germany Greece
 Greece Hong Kong
 Hong Kong India
 India Indonesia
 Indonesia Ireland
 Ireland Italy
 Italy Japan
 Japan Latvia
 Latvia Lithuania
 Lithuania Luxembourg
 Luxembourg Malaysia
 Malaysia Malta
 Malta Morocco
 Morocco Nepal
 Nepal Netherlands
 Netherlands New Zealand
 New Zealand Norway
 Norway Pakistan
 Pakistan Philippines
 Philippines Poland
 Poland Portugal
 Portugal Romania
 Romania Singapore
 Singapore Slovakia
 Slovakia Slovenia
 Slovenia South Africa
 South Africa South Korea
 South Korea Spain
 Spain Sweden
 Sweden Thailand
 Thailand The United States
 The United States Turkey
 Turkey United Arab Emirates
 United Arab Emirates United Kingdom
 United Kingdom Vietnam
 Vietnam